Massage Therapy Practice

Knowledge, Skills and Support for Massage Therapists

Member Login
User Name:
Password:
Register
2071 Haymarket Street
Ottawa K2A3M7
Ontario
Canada
Tel 613-724-6799
Email Us

 

 

Learn and earn for free.JPG


Case Studies Home Page Link

The Effects of Massage Therapy in Symptom Management for a Patient Undergoing Chemotherapy for Cancer

by Eric Mathis, DipMT, LMT

Abstract

The author designed and implemented a treatment plan to investigate the effects of massage therapy (MT) on pain reduction in patients undergoing chemotherapy for cancer. It was expected that a 50% reduction in pain scores would result. The subject was a 68 year-old female with a history of non-progressive, non-metastatic breast cancer who was undergoing chemotherapy following a complete mastectomy of her right breast, including removal of all axillary lymph nodes. Intense, intermittent pain was reported, along with moderate levels of anxiety and fatigue and low levels of depression. Five MT treatments were applied over a six-week period. All symptoms were assessed before, during, and after the study using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Memorial Pain Assessment Card (MPAC).

Data from the subject’s daily journal showed a 45.1% improvement in pain scores during the first five weeks of therapy. From beginning to end of the treatment series, scores for pain at its worst improved by 51%, despite the aggravation of all symptoms due to a stressful travel period during Week 4. Marked reductions in anxiety, depression were documented, as well as strong trends towards a decline in fatigue and sleeplessness. These data strongly suggest that MT is an appropriate tool for the management of pain and associated symptoms in patients undergoing chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer.

KEY WORDS: Massage; Cancer; Pain; Insomnia; Chemotherapy


Introduction

The five common symptoms associated with cancer and cancer treatments are pain, anxiety, nausea, fatigue, and depression. Pain is considered to be one of the greatest fears for people with cancer,1 and it is estimated that between 6% and 26% incorporate MT into their treatment.2,3 Although history has seen some controversy over the use of MT to treat patients with cancer, its safety is generally considered to be no longer in question.2,4 The Canadian Cancer Society, the BC Cancer Agency, the American Cancer Society, and the U.S. National Cancer Institute all recommend MT for the treatment of pain. 5–8

Recent studies have been directed at establishing the efficacy of MT for the treatment of symptoms of cancer. A randomized trial conducted at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City resulted in a 47.8% improvement in pain symptoms among cancer patients through the use of MT.9 The same research also documented improvements in anxiety (59.9%), nausea (51.4%), depression (48.9%), and fatigue (42.9%). Data also suggested that the effects of MT probably increase for each additional treatment. Another study resulted in a 41% reduction in the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs over the course of a four-week treatment plan.10 The current study used general relaxation MT to treat a subject undergoing chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer. It was expected that a 50% reduction in pain symptoms would result.


Method

Symptoms were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively before and after each session using the MPAC, a tool validated by Fishman11 and recommended as an outcome measure in clinical trials.12 The MPAC is an 8.5 by 11 inch card which measures pre-treatment pain intensity eight pain intensity indicators along with a VAS. Two more VASs measure post-treatment pain relief and mood. A VAS was also used before and after the treatment series to measure changes in current and average pain, pain at its best, and pain at its worst. Secondary outcome measures were anxiety, nausea, physical fatigue, depression, quality of life, and quality of sleep. In addition, the subject maintained a daily journal13 to track symptoms with VASs, as well as hours of sleep and the consumption of analgesic and sleep medication.

The VAS is one of the most frequently used outcome measures for pain. It has been accepted by Magee and others as a reliable quantitative measurement of a patient’s characteristic that occurs across a continuum.14,15 It consists of a 100mm horizontal line accompanied by narrative descriptions at each end. All scores reported are based on a scale of 0 to 100. It is a highly subjective measure and is most useful when attempting to assess change in patients.

Subject Profile

            A 68 year-old female was referred for this study by the medical staff at Dr. Edward Chalmers Hospital (DECH). The subject was undergoing treatment for early stage intraductal and lobular cancer in her right breast. The diagnosis was based on the results of a biopsy and a complete mastectomy had been successfully performed, including removal of all 14 axillary lymph nodes. Ongoing medical assessments found no metastases. The MT treatment series began on October 17th, four months after the mastectomy, and 12 days after the subject’s fourth cycle of chemotherapy. The final two cycles, consisting of epirubicin, fluorouracil, and cyclophosphamide, were administered during the course of the massage treatment series.

The subject was taking a number of different medications, including pravastatin for cholesterol reduction. For four days after each cycle of chemotherapy, the subject consumed antiemetics (Zofran®, Decadron®, and Maxeran®) which eliminated all symptoms of nausea. The anti-anxiety medication lorazepam was prescribed as a sleep-aid. The only analgesic medication being consumed was Tylenol®, taken as needed.

The subject’s initial symptoms included intense intermittent pain in the right axilla and lateral thorax around the surgical scar when overdoing physical activity. The most significant secondary symptoms prior to the study were moderate degrees of anxiety (39.0) and a reduced quality of sleep (50.5). The subject saw a physiotherapist every three weeks for treatment of Stage 3 adhesive capsulitis in the right shoulder, and did the prescribed stretching and strengthening exercises. She considered herself to be in excellent health and maintained an active lifestyle, swimming one hour almost every day throughout the chemotherapy series. The subject’s stated goal for MT was “improved spiritual and emotional feelings.”

Treatment Plan

The treatment plan was designed to reduce the subject’s perception of pain and to meet her personal treatment goal, as stated above. The mutual subject-therapist conclusion was that a light touch relaxation massage was most appropriate given the subject’s goals and case history. Specific techniques were chosen according to their documented analgesic effects and their ability to reduce sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activation and pain.15,16 The therapist did not address the adhesive capsulitis, as it was being treated by the physiotherapist. Five treatments were to be administered over five consecutive weeks, applied over the clothes and without lotion at the request of the subject.

Each session was divided into four segments. Segment 1 began with twenty stationary circles at the terminus (just deep to the clavicular insertions of the sternocleidomastoid muscle) to stimulate the lymphatic system.15 The main focus was reduction of SNS activation through the use of static contact, stroking, effleurage, light kneadings, and muscle squeezing. Areas treated included the occiput, neck, upper shoulders, and upper pectorals. Specific focus was on hypertonic scalenes, suboccipitals, and trapezius.

Segment 2 focused on the right arm and hand, with the goal of maintaining lymph flow and reducing the risk of lymphedema. 15,16 Although no signs of lymphedema were present, the risk contraindicated use of deep or aggressive techniques.17–19 Reduced sensation in the right triceps area due to iatrogenic nerve damage was an additional reason for reduced pressure in that region. Treatment consisted of static contact, stroking, light compressions, and light effleurage, with gentle techniques applied specifically to the forearm flexors and thenar muscles.

Segment 3 focused on relaxation of the left shoulder and arm. Due to the risk of lymphedema in the right arm, the right-handed subject was attempting to train her left hand to accomplish more activities of daily living. No particular hypertonicities were present.

Segment 4 returned to treatment of the posterior neck and scalp. Focus was on the suboccipitals and temporalis, mainly using static contact and light kneads. This region was treated last in order to minimize the length of time the subject’s head was not wrapped with a towel due to an expressed sensitivity to cold. Each session concluded with static contact at the occiput.

Treatment modifications were applied according to Walton, MacDonald, and Curties.17–19 Ongoing chemotherapy contraindicated direct treatment to the right breast region, including the scar. “Hands-on” treatment time per session was reduced to 45 minutes from the typical 60 minutes in order to avoid fatiguing the subject. Treatment 1 was expected to be shorter to allow for a thorough health history interview. The only medication consideration was cyclophosphamide, known to exit the patient’s body with sweat for up to 48 hours after being administered.18 This was not a concern in this study, as treatments were not carried out during the critical time period.


Results 

Treatment results were divided into five periods for the sake of data analysis (Figure 1). Periods 1 – 3 were separated by the first three treatments. Period 4 encompassed the subject’s five-day trip to Halifax, beginning with a stressful five-hour drive through a snow storm. It was a distressing week for the subject due to personal reasons and resulted in a sharp increase in all reported symptoms, as well as an unexpected interruption in the consecutive weeks of treatment. The treatment plan was extended one week to accommodate a fifth session. Period 5 began one day after the subject’s return from Halifax and continued until Treatment 4. The daily journal was not maintained beyond Treatment 4 (Week 5), due to the change in the treatment schedule.

 

Fig 1 Symptom Scores from Daily Journal.JPG  

 

A four-hour road trip during Week 1 resulted in a brief increase in symptoms (Figure 1). One day prior to Treatment 2, the subject began periodic attempts at reducing consumption of sleep medication from 2 mg of lorazepam to 1 mg.13 The journal entries for hours of sleep with either 1 mg or 2 mg were averaged within the five periods ± 1 SD error bars (Figure 2). Treatment 2 scored 0 for pre-treatment pain, but aggravated pain associated with the adhesive capsulitis, resulting in post-treatment pain scores of 33.0 for pain and 80.4 for mood. The subject enjoyed the treatment otherwise and felt very relaxed.

 

Fig 2 Improvement in Sleep.JPG  

 

Two tablets of Tylenol® were consumed daily until a complete cessation from the day of Treatment 3 to the end of the subject’s log. A fifth cycle of chemotherapy was administered on October 26, resulting in another spike in symptoms during Period 2. Treatments 4 and 5 were the only two in which the subject reported pre-treatment pain (47.4, 22.7). Massage resulted in post-treatment relief scores of 91.8 and 100, respectively. The subject typically slept through the sessions, including the one that aggravated the adhesive capsulitis pain. Post-treatment mood scores were high throughout the series (93.8, 80.4, 94.8, 100, 100).

Average pain scores improved 45.1% over the first five weeks of the study (Figure 1). Post-series scores for pain at its worst and average anxiety showed improvements of 51.0% and 76.9%, respectively, from the pre-series assessment (Table 1). The subject reported improved spiritual and emotional feelings consistent with her initial goals and expressed an appreciation for time spent with the therapist relative to the time available with her conventional healthcare specialists. The therapist had more time to listen to the subject’s questions and concerns, and was able to address them either immediately or upon further research. The score for quality of life at the end of the series was 100 (Table 1).

 

Table 1 Symptom Scores.JPG  

 

 


Discussion

The 45.1% improvement in pain scores was consistent with published findings as well as the study’s hypothesis. Evidence of pain relief was further supported by cessation of Tylenol® consumption. The interruption in the treatment plan provided an unexpected benefit to the study of an upset. Over the course of the first three weeks of consecutive treatments, average pain scores showed an 86.2% improvement with a corresponding decrease in scores for anxiety and depression (Figure 1). Period 5 indicated resumption of the downward symptom trends. The increase in overall scores for average fatigue (Table 1) reflects single data point observations at the beginning and end of the series, measurements which are much less statistically relevant than the daily logs which indicate a strong trend towards a decline in fatigue over the course of consecutive massage treatments (Figure 1). The increase in depression scores (Table 1) is statistically indistinguishable, given the standard deviation.

A significant secondary outcome of the study was the improvement in sleep patterns. Published research shows mixed results in the ability of MT to treat insomnia. Effects were determined to be inconclusive in one study,20 while others have presented improved sleep as one of MT’s possible benefits.21,22 At the end of Period 5 in the current study, the subject was sleeping 8 hours per night with only 1 mg of lorazepam (Figure 2). This reflected a dramatic increase from 3 hours slept on October 23 with 1 mg, and an improvement over the series average of 7.4 hours per night when consuming 2 mg. Within the daily data, there was also a progressive decline in hours slept per night in the days following a treatment until the following session provided a renewed increase.13 These data were considered to be much more statistically relevant then the negative results indicated by the pre- and post-series assessments of quality of sleep (Table 1).

It has been reported that patients use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in part because they value the closer relationships possible with CAM practitioners.23 This was also clearly expressed by the subject of the current study, and it is speculated that this contributed to the reduction in anxiety scores. Also of note was the mention of a headache during intake for Treatment 5. This new symptom was mostly dismissed by the subject, but the therapist advised that her doctor be informed as soon as possible. The doctor felt that the symptoms might indicate temporal arteritis and immediately conducted further tests. While the headaches proved to be harmless, the incident showed how a massage therapist can contribute in an integrative approach to healthcare.

A problem which may have affected results was that the descriptors on the MPAC and VASs did not always accurately describe the subject’s perception of symptoms. This resulted in a spoiled pre-series score for average pain (Table 1). In addition, the incomplete data from the journal showed clear positive trends, but lacked the conclusiveness that a full set of data could have provided.


Conclusion

In conclusion, this case study showed clearly that MT led to large, immediate reductions in the pain, anxiety, and depression of a patient undergoing chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer. Marked improvements in sleep patterns were also documented, along with a reduction in fatigue. Not only is massage an effective therapy, it is non-invasive and greatly appreciated by its recipients. Further random controlled trials should be conducted to clearly establish the potential benefits to those patients whose sleep is affected by cancer and its treatment.


Acknowledgments

This study was conducted in partial fulfillment of the graduation requirements of the Atlantic College of Therapeutic Massage in Fredericton, New Brunswick.

In addition to thanking the subject of this study, the author wishes to acknowledge Dr. Nancy Mathis for her generous help in data analysis, formatting, and editing. Lisa Ivany, RMT, Candace Gerrior, RMT, and Sharon Jones-Gilmore, RMT served as clinical supervisors. The cooperation of Kim Chapman, Clinical Nurse Specialist (Oncology) at DECH was also invaluable.

 


Biography

Eric Mathis is a graduate of the Atlantic College of Therapeutic Massage in Fredericton, New Brunswick and recently began practicing as a licensed massage therapist in the State of Hawaii. In addition, he has been Associate Principal Trombone of the Honolulu Symphony since 1996. He can be reached for comment at eric@lonepalmmassage.com.



References Hyperlink

 


 

Learn and earn for free.JPG

 

 

 

 

 

 

casereport.gif  

Massage Practitioner Case Report Contest!

iih.jpg  

Massage Therapy Home Study Programs

lubricant.gif  

Massage Lubricant and Related Supplies

 

lackner.gif  

Professional Liability Insurance Provider

eic.gif  

Evidence Based and Best Practices Oriented Massage Therapy Education